Welcome back Viphilus*
Last week I told you about
the “surprise me” maneuver . But were you surprised at how easy it appears to
engage people? Are you a skeptic and say, “no way – it’s not that easy.” Maybe
you are a manager who feels like you just can’t find the start button to
getting your people moving. Maybe you are a parent of a child who’s inertial
lethargy feels monumental. Maybe you simply believe that you don’t possess the
necessary “soft skills” to motivate or influence people the way that you want
(or more importantly, the way that they need).
{note: I detest the term
“soft skills” because everyone knows they are the hardest ones to develop … BUT
THEY CAN BE DEVELOPED}
About 10 years ago as I was
doing extensive research on leadership and engagement (through reading and
attending lectures, workshops and conferences), I noticed that despite the
different language that the authors, teachers and speakers were using,
everything they said about engagement could be boiled down into three
independent (but linked) categories: Purpose; Identity; and Empowerment. In
2007 I began teaching about PIE openly at both my workplace and my church, as
well as in individual coaching. Having no special training or credentials to
call myself an expert, I left the door open (wide open actually) to have my
theory modified. That’s why I was so thrilled to read Dan Pink’s book, “Drive:
the surprising truth about what motivates us.”
Whether you have read the
book or not, if you have not seen the 11-minute RSA-animate version of Dan’stalk … then OH MY … click the link right now and enjoy … but please come back.
The reason that I was
thrilled was that I was NOT surprised about what Dan shared through his data
and stories; I had come to similar conclusions through my own research and
experiences. Make sure you get his book (highly recommended).
Dan’s three identified prime
motivators are purpose, mastery and autonomy. My belief is that the last two of
these are actually subsets of the broader categories identity and empowerment.
Dan mentions empowerment in his book but mostly dismisses it because it is a
highly misunderstood term that is being abused in workplaces everywhere. I
agree with his assessment, but rather than bypass the word because it is not
being used properly, I prefer to train out the dysfunction and learn to use the
word in its fullest context.
Below is a graphic that I
use in training on P.I.E. with each category being defined in its simplest
manner.
Rather than using the word
motivation as Mr. Pink does, I am choosing “engagement,” which I think provides
a more holistic sense of the human condition. And as has been proven over and
over again in studies (not to mention anecdotal evidence … such as what engages
you yourself), motivation or engagement not only peaks when it is intrinsic, it
is also more sustainable (extrinsic motivators come and go but you are always
with yourself). J
Let me provide my own data
on each of these.
PURPOSE
When we do things for a
reason, this automatically raises our engagement. When that reason resides
within us and is not simply provided by a command/request from someone else,
this points us to the “start button.” Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
says that “purpose is activation energy for living.”
In 1996 my in-laws came with
us to Florida for a 2-week theme-park extravanganza, along with my mother and
two kids (aged 9 and 7). My Mom flew but the rest of us drove. My mother-in-law
did exactly as we expected … she slept for 3-4 days in the car as we journeyed
to gloryland.
Then we arrived, checked into our condo, and discussed the plans for the next day. I’m an early riser and
was the first one up the next morning. Or so I thought. I was asked to wake up
my in-laws at 7am … they were in an adjacent condo. I knocked and “Nanny”
opened the door, fully-dressed, and saying, “I’m ready!” Say whaaaaaa? She had already eaten too. Say whaaaaaaaaaa? For the next hour she politely
kept asking, “I’m ready … what are we waiting for?” It was like this for the
entire two weeks.
A rainy day at Epcot ... Nanny is sitting in the wheelchair and chomping at the bit to get to the next attraction |
What’s so special about this story? The fact that she was in her late 70s? Nope. It was the fact that she had required almost full-time care-giving by her husband for as long as I had known her and that she had been someone with clinical depression for decades, and had been in hospital for almost 6 months less than a year earlier. Neither my wife nor father-in-law had ever seen her so engaged – like ever.
Nanny had purpose! Purpose
alone can be powerful.
Mr. Pink’s “mastery” is one
aspect which helps define our “identity.” When I was in high school I pursued
math and sciences. But that’s not what I remember. What floods my mind with
almost all of the memories are the hundreds (maybe thousands) of hours that my
friend Wayne and I spent playing trombone together. I was a nerd, therefore,
not at all aligned with the social crowd. But everyone knew I was the “trombone
guy.” That reputation alone generated passion in me to get better and develop
mastery. I actually got reasonably skilled at the instrument and it was
completely intertwined with who I was. I never considered myself an artistic
type but I can truly understand how artists find it almost impossible to
separate themselves from their art/craft (and why criticism of their work is
very personal).
Mastery is only one dimension of identity but this example is enough to make my point … for now.
Mastery is only one dimension of identity but this example is enough to make my point … for now.
EMPOWERMENT
Similarly, Dan Pink’s “autonomy”
is simply one aspect of “empowerment.” True empowerment is freedom to be able
to do what you need to do, the ability to make decisions about how to do it,
and the necessary resources/tools to enable execution. Back in 1995 I was given
a wonderful opportunity at work; they wanted me to write a book. Actually, I
had co-written a book in the late 80s on marine weather hazards in Atlantic
Canada and three other books had been written in the following few years as
supplements; the supplements focused on local weather effects around Atlantic
Canada. By the time we got to 1995 there was a growing demand to have all 4
books rolled into one large guide to marine weather in the region. A lot of new
information was available to include in the book as well as significant
improvements to what had been written. I estimated 6-7 months to do the job, if
I could focus … something difficult to do in a workplace that could be best
described as cube-ville (if you've ever read Dilbert cartoons you understand).
I asked my manager if I
could do some of the research and writing from home (teleworking was a
relatively novel concept at that time but not unheard of).
“Sure – do whatever you need
to write the book,” she said. I thanked her and asked what kind of reporting
protocols she had in mind.
“Just let me know how it’s
going when there’s something worth reporting and let me know if there are any
problems or something that you need.”
“Great,” I said … “but do
you want me to give you a report once a week … once a month … or what?”
<pause>
“Just bring me a book by the
end of March.”
The finished product was
called, “Where the Wind Blows.”
That’s empowerment.
(note – Martha,
my manager, didn't take it too far and ignore me, because that would have been
abrogation … she simply made sure I always had what I needed in order to do the
job).
I've only cracked the
surface of this topic, but my own data supports what others report. P.I.E. is a
principle that you can take to the bank when it comes to engaging a human
being. Next week we’ll get personal and see how you are at engaging yourself
(if you always wait for someone else to do it for you it will be a long hard
life).
Blessings Viphilus,
Your friend, Omega Man
* Viphilus means, "lover of life"
No comments:
Post a Comment